2026 Annual Review · Filed Document

Regular & Substantive Interaction: Instructor Reference

Nature
Practitioner reference for keeping online courses RSI-compliant
Basis
34 CFR § 600.2 (federal); ACCSC Standards of Accreditation (July 1, 2025), § IX.D.4 / G.4 ("timely and meaningful interaction")
Reviewed
May 29, 2026, against the current rule
Re
RSI is the federal line separating Title IV-eligible distance education from correspondence courses. This reference resolves the practical questions.

01 The rule in one sentence

A qualified instructor, on a predictable schedule, does at least two kinds of real teaching with students, and keeps an eye on engagement and reaches out when needed.

02 The two tests

Substantive, and regular

03 Key principles

The five that resolve most questions

04 The weight table

What counts, and how much to lean on it

ActivityRSI weightWhy
Weekly personal feedback on assignmentsPrimary pillarInstructor-initiated, scheduled, per-student. Teaching-rich feedback covers both assessment/feedback and direct instruction in one act, so it can carry the two-type bar on its own, and it doubles as the monitoring record.
Proactive, observation-driven engagementSecond pillarA content-specific message sent when your review surfaces a pattern or an at-risk student ("several of you missed X, here is the fix"). Instructor-initiated and current; near-zero extra effort since you are already reviewing the work.
Weekly teaching post to the classSupportingCounts only with a current-cohort hook ("what I am seeing this week"). A reused-identical post is content, not interaction, so treat it as a delivery vehicle for proactive engagement, not a standalone pillar.
Start / mid / end check-ins + outreach when someone goes quietRequired prongThis is the monitoring plus proactive-engagement half of "regular."
Online office hoursBonusSubstantive when attended, but student-initiated, so not a standalone pillar. Stronger when you proactively send a specific student to a session.
Answering questions (FSO messaging)BonusCounts when it happens, but reactive. Cannot anchor RSI; if no one asks, nothing occurred.
Embedded / evergreen course videosNot RSIInstructional content (governed by the materials standard), not interaction. "Sending" a build-once video does not change this.
Live lecturesNot requiredOptional; attendance irrelevant; skip if it is a time-sink.

A video only edges toward counting if it is cohort-current and timely, e.g., a recap recorded this term addressing this class's common errors, posted that week. Freshness and responsiveness to where students are is what would flip it from content to interaction.

05 Recommended setup

Low time-sink, fully asynchronous

06 Documentation

What an audit wants to see

In an audit, the school must be able to show RSI happened. The LMS (FSO) interaction and feedback records, plus posted weekly announcements and check-in messages, are the evidence. Keep the teaching posts and outreach inside the LMS so they are logged.

07 Caveats

Scope

Sources

34 CFR § 600.2, Definitions (distance education, instructor, regular, substantive). law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/600.2

WCET, RSI Refresh: Reviewing & Sharing Our Best Interpretation of Current Guidance and Requirements. wcet.wiche.edu

ACCSC Standards of Accreditation, July 1 2025, Section IX (Distance Education), D.4 and G.4.

Filed Document · 2026 Annual Review Full Sail University